Mahoney

  • Our Team
    • Column Team
      • Team
      • Kevin J. Mahoney
      • Joan M. LeGraw
      • Georgia Pasqualone
      • Roisin
  • Practice Areas
    • Column One
      • Drug Offenses
      • Crimes of Violence
      • Sex Crimes
      • Motor Vehicle Offenses
      • Theft Crimes
      • Illegal Possession of Firearms
      • Obstructing Justice Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
      • Federal Defense
      • Probation Violations
      • Restraining Orders
      • Professional Misconduct
      • Custody of Domestic Pets, Dogs & Cats Litigation
    • Column Two
      • Cyber Crimes
      • Hate Crimes
      • Appeals
      • Clerk Magistrate Hearings
      • Immigration
      • Civil Litigation
      • Civil Suits Against Law Enforcement
      • Personal Injury
      • College Crimes
      • Title IX Investigations
      • Juvenile Law
      • Estate Planning & Asset Protection
      • Last Will and Testament
      • Representation Before DCF
      • Dangerous or Nuisance Dog Defense
  • What Should I Do?
    • Cloumn One
      • Selecting a Winning Lawyer
      • Recommended Lawyers
      • Succeeding With Your Lawyer
      • Right to a Telephone Call
      • Miranda Rights
      • Should I Speak with Police?
      • Coping With Stress of Court
      • Bill of Rights
      • Mass Declaration of Rights
      • Street Encounters or Terry Stops
      • Cooperating With DEA or Police
    • Column Two
      • Common Defenses
      • Right to Self-Defense
      • Reasonable Doubt
      • What to Wear to Court
      • How to Behave in Court
      • Overview of the Justice System
      • Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer
      • Cambridge Drug Trafficking Lawyer: Knock and Talk
      • Motor Vehicle Searches
  • Forensics
    • Column One
      • Forensic Experts
      • Preserving the Crime Scene
      • Collecting Evidence
      • Trace Evidence
      • Fingerprint Evidence
      • Autopsy
      • Gunshot Wounds
      • Stab Wounds
      • Drowning
      • Child Homicide
      • Rape Kit
    • Column Two
      • DNA Evidence
      • Forensic Dentistry
      • Forensic Botany
      • Toxicology
  • Mahoney in the Media
    • In the News
    • TV Appearances
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

Andrea Yates

Prosecutors Used Non-Existent Television Show to Convict Andrea Yates of Murder

10 January 2005–In yet another unsettling instance of prosecutorial misfeasance or misconduct, the First Court of Appeals has concluded that prosecutors deprived Andrea Yates of a fair trial by using a non-existent episode of the television show “Law and Order” to convince jurors to convict her of murder.

Prosecutors had called forensic psychiatrist Park Dietz to the stand to testify that Yates was sane when she had drowned her children. Dr. Dietz claimed, in short, that Yates had likely gotten the idea of killing her children and claiming insanity from an episode of “Law and Order,” that had aired shortly before the drownings. The prosecutors then called two additional witnesses to testify that Yates watched “Law and Order” religiously. So important was this episode to their case against Yates, the prosecution referred to the episode in their closing argument.

Setting aside for the moment that the prosecution should have taken the time to at least discover whether the episode existed before parading Dr. Dietz before the jury, the prosecutors, in an effort to safeguard their tainted victory, argued that Dr. Dietz’s testimony and their reliance on it during their closing argument was “immaterial” to their case. Rather than take responsibility for their part in this injustice and join the defense in petitioning the Court of Appeals for a new trial, the prosecutors shamelessly claim that their incompetence and the perjury of their star witness was irrelevant to the jury.

Dr. Dietz-who has testified in such high-profile cases as Susan Smith (who drowned her children in a lake in South Carolina), serial killer and cannibal Jeffrey Dahmer, and “Unabomber” Ted Kaczynski-angrily claims that he has been the victim of “a false accusation by a defense lawyer.” He says now that he made only a simple mistake. A simple mistake when a woman is accused of first-degree murder? Any responsible forensic expert would, at a minimum, have made an effort to re-watch the episode to determine whether his memory squared with the show. Just how did Dr. Dietz conclude that Yates – who had attempted suicide and suffered from depression – was sane? No doubt, Dr. Dietz, like many, if not all, forensic psychiatrists who testify for the prosecution, approached his “investigation” into Yates mental status pre-disposed to finding her sane. His willingness to incorporate a fuzzy memory of a television show he had watched, or maybe only heard about, into his expert analysis of her state of mind at the time of the drownings exposes him as a mercenary, willing to sell the accused down the river to advance his career.

And what of the prosecution? Did they not have some responsibility to check the facts? No doubt delighted that Dr. Dietz had constructed an exciting storyline to pawn off on the jury, the prosecutors did not bother themselves with details – like whether Dr. Dietz’s theory was based on facts. Of course, a thinking prosecutor may have wanted to show portions of the episode to the jury to drive home the point that Yates had been inspired to kill her children by the show. Toward that end, in such a high-profile case, would they not have simply ordered the episode from Amazon or asked the producers of “Law and Order” for copy of the episode? If they did, then they learned that the episode did not exist. The Texas Bar should investigate these prosecutors for unethical conduct and, if they deliberately shoveled shit before the jury, should disbar them – and then prosecute them.

PRINT THIS PAGE

TOP

Testimonials

  • NS, a DUI client,about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    I just wanted to say thank you for such a wonderful and excellent job you did for me. You were quite impressive up there and you really did your homework catching her in a few lies from previous testimony. You are the best! Even though I never want to be in this situation again, if I know anyone I will give them your name.

    Thank Amy for me too! She is a great asset to have in your office! Very pleasant and understanding.

    Again thank you and go Celtics!
     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Kevin Mahoney recently represented me in a case for destruction of property and disorderly conduct. He was extremely thorough and persistent, and despite a great deal of evidence against me, he managed to get the felony charge dropped without having to go to trial.

    I had never been in legal trouble before and had no idea how to proceed, and without his counsel, I am sure that I would have gotten convicted.

    He listened to my specific needs and always acted in my best interest. His knowledge, attention to detail, and general courtroom presence continued to amaze me throughout the entire process.
     

    text

  • M.K.about 1 month ago

    Dear Attorney Mahoney:

    I wish to express my sincere appreciation for your efforts on my behalf. Your defense was truly outstanding. The court room skills that you demonstrated and legal knowledge were truly incomparable. I’m wishing you the very best in your future endeavors.

    In addition, I ‘m looking forward to viewing the Jello Trial on Court T.V. Let me thank you once again.

     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    Is very knowledgeable and very professional. He has just represented me in a case lasting a year and a half, and he made sure I got a fair trial with a fair jury. He kept me well informed about what would be happening in the court room and always had a well thought out defense for any route of attack the D.A. would be planning on.

    My trial took 2 and a half days and after the jury deliberated for approximately 23 minutes they came back with a “Not guilty” verdict. I would recommend Attorney Mahoney to anyone I know, but I sure hope I dont need him again. : ) .
     

    text

Call 617.492.0055

Available to Respond to Emergencies
24 Hours a Day

Directions

Kevin J. Mahoney’s New Book Coming Soon

The Title IX Sexual Harassment Handbook

"Attorney Mahoney is currently authoring an authoritative and strategy driven compendium on investigating and defending Title IX sexual assault cases for lawyers, students, and universities. The book will be available through James Publishing within months."

Our Team

  • Kevin J. Mahoney
    • Trial Record
    • Book: Relentless Criminal Cross-Examination
    • Philosophy
    • Commentary on the Power of the System
      • Judges
      • Unethical Prosecutors
      • Middlesex County D.A.’s Office
    • Commentary on High Profile Cases
      • Persecution of Palestinian Children By Israeli Military Courts
      • No Crying or Outcry Over Spilt Milk
      • Case Against Amanda Knox: All Fantasy No Evidence
      • U.S. Attorney’s Office on Tilt
      • Lindsay Lohan
      • Amanda Knox
      • Roger Clemens
      • Neil Entwistle
      • Andrea Yates
      • Martha Stewart
      • Scott Peterson
      • Kobe Bryant
      • Jayson Williams
      • Pring Wilson
    • Ode to Criminal Defense Lawyer
  • Team
    • Joan M. LeGraw
    • Georgia Pasqualone
    • Roisin
© 2023 Mahoney Criminal Defense Group.
All Rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
footer-logo

For a Free in-office Consultation Call 617-492-0055

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Practice Areas
  • Areas we serve
  • Mahoney In the Media