Mahoney

  • Our Team
    • Column Team
      • Team
      • Kevin J. Mahoney
      • Joan M. LeGraw
      • Georgia Pasqualone
      • Roisin
  • Practice Areas
    • Column One
      • Drug Offenses
      • Crimes of Violence
      • Sex Crimes
      • Motor Vehicle Offenses
      • Theft Crimes
      • Illegal Possession of Firearms
      • Obstructing Justice Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
      • Federal Defense
      • Probation Violations
      • Restraining Orders
      • Professional Misconduct
      • Custody of Domestic Pets, Dogs & Cats Litigation
    • Column Two
      • Cyber Crimes
      • Hate Crimes
      • Appeals
      • Clerk Magistrate Hearings
      • Immigration
      • Civil Litigation
      • Civil Suits Against Law Enforcement
      • Personal Injury
      • College Crimes
      • Title IX Investigations
      • Juvenile Law
      • Estate Planning & Asset Protection
      • Last Will and Testament
      • Representation Before DCF
      • Dangerous or Nuisance Dog Defense
  • What Should I Do?
    • Cloumn One
      • Selecting a Winning Lawyer
      • Recommended Lawyers
      • Succeeding With Your Lawyer
      • Right to a Telephone Call
      • Miranda Rights
      • Should I Speak with Police?
      • Coping With Stress of Court
      • Bill of Rights
      • Mass Declaration of Rights
      • Street Encounters or Terry Stops
      • Cooperating With DEA or Police
    • Column Two
      • Common Defenses
      • Right to Self-Defense
      • Reasonable Doubt
      • What to Wear to Court
      • How to Behave in Court
      • Overview of the Justice System
      • Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer
      • Cambridge Drug Trafficking Lawyer: Knock and Talk
      • Motor Vehicle Searches
  • Forensics
    • Column One
      • Forensic Experts
      • Preserving the Crime Scene
      • Collecting Evidence
      • Trace Evidence
      • Fingerprint Evidence
      • Autopsy
      • Gunshot Wounds
      • Stab Wounds
      • Drowning
      • Child Homicide
      • Rape Kit
    • Column Two
      • DNA Evidence
      • Forensic Dentistry
      • Forensic Botany
      • Toxicology
  • Mahoney in the Media
    • In the News
    • TV Appearances
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

Neil Entwistle

Can Neil Entwistle Receive a Fair Trial?

Outside the Framingham District Court following his client’s arraignment for two counts of 1st degree murder, Elliot Weinstein intoned, “I don’t know that Mr. Entwistle will ever be able to get a fair trial on these charges. I am certain that anybody watching this telecast or reading the reporting of today’s arraignment has already formed an opinion with respect to Mr. Entwistle’s guilt. … And that opinion is based on absolutely no facts and absolutely no evidence, and that is quite unfortunate.”

In their rush to cover the next big case, the media have reported every available detail of the police investigation into the slayings of Rachel and Lillian Entwistle. The media coverage has been overwhelming. And while most reporters remember to include the word “allegedly” where necessary, the drumbeat of “guilty, guilty, guilty” is barely concealed. No Massachusetts citizen, the semi-conscious included, has escaped the onslaught of reporting.

Was Weinstein right? Is the system incapable of providing Entwistle with twelve impartial jurors? Is there any way to verify that these jurors are untainted by the media swirl, free of bias, and unmotivated by dreams of cashing in on a book deal? The answer is no. Massachusetts courts are notoriously hostile to efforts by either the defense or the prosecution to test the biases of potential jurors or their understanding of the fundamental constitutional underpinnings of a criminal trial, such as the presumption of innocence, the burden of proof, the accused’s Fifth Amendment Right not to incriminate himself, and standard by which to judge the government’s evidence, proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

In most states, defense counsel and the prosecutor are permitted to voir dire the jury pool – directly question potential jurors about their biases, their understanding of the trial mechanics and their willingness to apply the appropriate standard to the evidence. Through their voir dire, Defense counsel and prosecutor educate them on the roles of the attorneys, the jury’s role as fact finders and the judge’s role as the trial’s referee. Because it allows the lawyers a give-and-take session with the potential jurors, voir dire is a tremendous tool for ferreting out potential jurors who have already made up their minds, are eager for some vigilante justice, or motivated by mythical book deals.

In Massachusetts, voir dire is not a tool, but a hoax. Like an apparition, it only gives the appearance of substance. Our “voir dire” amounts to no more than the defense lawyer, and maybe the prosecutor, formally submitting maybe 10 or 20 questions for the judge to ask the jury pool. The judge skims the questions, and if he feels like it, asks the jury pool maybe three or four of them. A conscientious judge will put these questions to the potential juror at sidebar, somewhat out of the hearing of people crowding the courtroom. With the judge standing, and elevated, before the potential juror, a prosecutor over one shoulder and defense counsel over the other, a couple of court officers in nice pressed white shirts a few feet away, a grimacing clerk, and a court reporter taking down his every word, it’s not an environment that promotes a free easy exchange between the citizen and those who seek to know their minds.

In Entwistle’s case, potential jurors who admit that they’ve been marinating in cesspool of negative media coverage and harbor a suspicion that the accused is guilty are shown the door. Those who claim they’ve read or heard little about the case and harbor no such suspicion and say they will keep an open mind throughout the trial take a seat in the jury box. While defense counsel and the prosecutor can still exercise a peremptory challenge on the would-be jurors, they are acting on limited information. The prosecutor will strike those jurors who look like they held up a convenience store on the way to court and defense counsel will strike those who seem like they’d like to make a citizen’s arrest.

And these jurors, with their personal histories, undisclosed prejudices, intellectual habits, and pre-existing knowledge of the accusations will, at the end of the trial, be sent to the deliberating room to ruminate on Entwistle’s fate. Whether after a two month long trial these jurors can distinguish between what they read or heard, separate their long stoked feelings about the murders from their obligation to impartially evaluate the government’s case, or whether they even give a shit about the standard of proof, we’ll never know.

PRINT THIS PAGE

TOP

Testimonials

  • NS, a DUI client,about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    I just wanted to say thank you for such a wonderful and excellent job you did for me. You were quite impressive up there and you really did your homework catching her in a few lies from previous testimony. You are the best! Even though I never want to be in this situation again, if I know anyone I will give them your name.

    Thank Amy for me too! She is a great asset to have in your office! Very pleasant and understanding.

    Again thank you and go Celtics!
     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Kevin Mahoney recently represented me in a case for destruction of property and disorderly conduct. He was extremely thorough and persistent, and despite a great deal of evidence against me, he managed to get the felony charge dropped without having to go to trial.

    I had never been in legal trouble before and had no idea how to proceed, and without his counsel, I am sure that I would have gotten convicted.

    He listened to my specific needs and always acted in my best interest. His knowledge, attention to detail, and general courtroom presence continued to amaze me throughout the entire process.
     

    text

  • M.K.about 1 month ago

    Dear Attorney Mahoney:

    I wish to express my sincere appreciation for your efforts on my behalf. Your defense was truly outstanding. The court room skills that you demonstrated and legal knowledge were truly incomparable. I’m wishing you the very best in your future endeavors.

    In addition, I ‘m looking forward to viewing the Jello Trial on Court T.V. Let me thank you once again.

     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    Is very knowledgeable and very professional. He has just represented me in a case lasting a year and a half, and he made sure I got a fair trial with a fair jury. He kept me well informed about what would be happening in the court room and always had a well thought out defense for any route of attack the D.A. would be planning on.

    My trial took 2 and a half days and after the jury deliberated for approximately 23 minutes they came back with a “Not guilty” verdict. I would recommend Attorney Mahoney to anyone I know, but I sure hope I dont need him again. : ) .
     

    text

Call 617.492.0055

Available to Respond to Emergencies
24 Hours a Day

Directions

Kevin J. Mahoney’s New Book Coming Soon

The Title IX Sexual Harassment Handbook

"Attorney Mahoney is currently authoring an authoritative and strategy driven compendium on investigating and defending Title IX sexual assault cases for lawyers, students, and universities. The book will be available through James Publishing within months."

Our Team

  • Kevin J. Mahoney
    • Trial Record
    • Book: Relentless Criminal Cross-Examination
    • Philosophy
    • Commentary on the Power of the System
      • Judges
      • Unethical Prosecutors
      • Middlesex County D.A.’s Office
    • Commentary on High Profile Cases
      • Persecution of Palestinian Children By Israeli Military Courts
      • No Crying or Outcry Over Spilt Milk
      • Case Against Amanda Knox: All Fantasy No Evidence
      • U.S. Attorney’s Office on Tilt
      • Lindsay Lohan
      • Amanda Knox
      • Roger Clemens
      • Neil Entwistle
      • Andrea Yates
      • Martha Stewart
      • Scott Peterson
      • Kobe Bryant
      • Jayson Williams
      • Pring Wilson
    • Ode to Criminal Defense Lawyer
  • Team
    • Joan M. LeGraw
    • Georgia Pasqualone
    • Roisin
© 2023 Mahoney Criminal Defense Group.
All Rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
footer-logo

For a Free in-office Consultation Call 617-492-0055

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Practice Areas
  • Areas we serve
  • Mahoney In the Media