Mahoney

  • Our Team
    • Column Team
      • Team
      • Kevin J. Mahoney
      • Joan M. LeGraw
      • Georgia Pasqualone
      • Roisin
  • Practice Areas
    • Column One
      • Drug Offenses
      • Crimes of Violence
      • Sex Crimes
      • Motor Vehicle Offenses
      • Theft Crimes
      • Illegal Possession of Firearms
      • Obstructing Justice Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
      • Federal Defense
      • Probation Violations
      • Restraining Orders
      • Professional Misconduct
      • Custody of Domestic Pets, Dogs & Cats Litigation
    • Column Two
      • Cyber Crimes
      • Hate Crimes
      • Appeals
      • Clerk Magistrate Hearings
      • Immigration
      • Civil Litigation
      • Civil Suits Against Law Enforcement
      • Personal Injury
      • College Crimes
      • Title IX Investigations
      • Juvenile Law
      • Estate Planning & Asset Protection
      • Last Will and Testament
      • Representation Before DCF
      • Dangerous or Nuisance Dog Defense
  • What Should I Do?
    • Cloumn One
      • Selecting a Winning Lawyer
      • Recommended Lawyers
      • Succeeding With Your Lawyer
      • Right to a Telephone Call
      • Miranda Rights
      • Should I Speak with Police?
      • Coping With Stress of Court
      • Bill of Rights
      • Mass Declaration of Rights
      • Street Encounters or Terry Stops
      • Cooperating With DEA or Police
    • Column Two
      • Common Defenses
      • Right to Self-Defense
      • Reasonable Doubt
      • What to Wear to Court
      • How to Behave in Court
      • Overview of the Justice System
      • Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer
      • Cambridge Drug Trafficking Lawyer: Knock and Talk
      • Motor Vehicle Searches
  • Forensics
    • Column One
      • Forensic Experts
      • Preserving the Crime Scene
      • Collecting Evidence
      • Trace Evidence
      • Fingerprint Evidence
      • Autopsy
      • Gunshot Wounds
      • Stab Wounds
      • Drowning
      • Child Homicide
      • Rape Kit
    • Column Two
      • DNA Evidence
      • Forensic Dentistry
      • Forensic Botany
      • Toxicology
  • Mahoney in the Media
    • In the News
    • TV Appearances
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

Breaking and Entering

breaking-entering-1

Winning Breaking & Entering and Home Invasion Cases

 Massachusetts Breaking and Entering Defense Lawyer

In most breaking & entering or home invasion cases, unless the police apprehend the person in the act, recover stolen items from the accused or his residence, or beguile a suspect into confessing, there may be little compelling evidence connecting the accused to the crime. In short, while the seriousness of charges such as B&E and home invasion cannot be overstated, there may be reasons to be hopeful. An experienced Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer will be able to objectively evaluate the strength of the prosecution’s case against you or your loved one.

Though liquor stores, convenience stores, restaurants, pharmacies, small businesses and, increasingly, homes are equipped with video cameras, the quality of these video recordings is sometimes so poor that a definitive identification of the perpetrator from the video alone is not possible. In some cases, the prosecution’s case hinges on eyewitness testimony – and eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable, particularly if the B&E or home invasion occurred at night. The difference between an acquittal and a conviction will often depend on the cross-examination skills of the lawyer. In his best-selling book, Relentless Criminal Cross-Examination, Attorney Mahoney devotes an entire chapter to effectively cross-examining eyewitnesses.

Occasionally, the police will lift fingerprints from the scene of the break-in. As discussed on the fingerprint forensic page, the police rarely recover more than a partial fingerprint and the police “expert” is vulnerable to an effective cross-examination. Moreover, if the accused had been a guest within the home, we would expect the police to recover his fingerprints.

Retain an Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer

Massachusetts Criminal Attorney Kevin J. Mahoney has successfully defended several individuals accused of breaking & entering, home invasion and trespassing.

Breaking & Entering Statutes

Breaking & Entering with Intent to Commit a Misdemeanor (G.L. c. 266, § 16A)
The Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant broke into a building, ship, vehicle or vessel, and entered the same with the intent to commit a misdemeanor. A conviction is punishable by a fine of not more than two hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or both.

Breaking & Entering in Night Time with Intent to Commit a Felony (G.L. c. 266, § 16)
The Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, at night, broke into a building, ship, vessel or vehicle and entered the same with the intent to commit a felony. A conviction is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than twenty years or in a jail or house of correction for not more than two and one-half years.

Breaking & Entering in the Day Time with Intent to Commit a Felony (G.L. c. 266, § 18)
The Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant broke into a building, ship, vessel or vehicle, during the daytime, and entered the same with the purpose to commit a felony. A conviction is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than ten years or by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars and imprisonment in jail for not more than two years. If the defendant was armed with a firearm, rifle, shotgun, machine gun or assault weapon during the crime, a conviction is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than five years or by imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than two and one-half years.

Results

Commonwealth vs. D.M., S. Boston District Court
B&E – Dismissed
B&E – Dismissed
B&E – Dismissed
B&E – Dismissed

Defendant seen on videotape entering four different apartments, and removing various items, within same complex. Attorney Mahoney persuaded DA’s Office and Court to place defendant on pre-trial probation, after which charges will be dismissed.

Commonwealth vs. J.R., Worcester Superior Court
Arson – Dismissed
Arson – Dismissed
Arson – Dismissed
Arson – Dismissed
Arson – Dismissed
B&E – Dismissed
B&E – Dismissed
B&E – Dismissed
B&E – Dismissed

The Defendant was the prime suspect in a series of fires in the town of Clinton. Members of the Clinton Fire Department, Clinton Police Department, State Police, and Railroad Police descended upon the Defendant’s home armed with a search warrant. The police seized, destroyed or damaged the Defendant’s personal property. They attempted to question the Defendant, but he invoked his right to an attorney. However, when the police threatened to tear down the house and put his family on the street, the Defendant confessed to the setting the five fires. After a four month long hearing on Attorney Mahoney’s motion to suppress the Defendant’s confession, the judge ruled the confession inadmissible. On the day of trial, Mahoney filed a motion in limine, convincing the trial judge to rule that the prosecutor couldn’t introduce additional statements from the Defendant that had not been suppressed. The District Attorney’s Office was forced to dismiss all the charges.

Commonwealth vs. G.B., Framingham District Court
Home Invasion – Dismissed
Home Invasion – Dismissed
B&E – Not Guilty
B&E – Not Guilty
A&B – Not Guilty
A&B – Not Guilty
Assault – Not Guilty
Malicious Destruction of Property – Not Guilty
Malicious Destruction of Property – Not Guilty
Threats – Not Guilty

The witnesses testified that the Defendant and co-defendant forced their way into home #1 and threatened, struck the residents and broke furniture. The Defendant and co-defendant proceeded to home #2 where they again forced way into home, assaulted the residents and destroyed furniture, lamps and a vacuum cleaner before leaving. The Defendant and co-defendant were arrested as they drove away.

Kevin J. Mahoney is a Cambridge, Massachusetts breaking and entering defense lawyer. Call 617-492-0055 to schedule a free in-office consultation with Attorney Mahoney.

TOP

Testimonials

  • NS, a DUI client,about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    I just wanted to say thank you for such a wonderful and excellent job you did for me. You were quite impressive up there and you really did your homework catching her in a few lies from previous testimony. You are the best! Even though I never want to be in this situation again, if I know anyone I will give them your name.

    Thank Amy for me too! She is a great asset to have in your office! Very pleasant and understanding.

    Again thank you and go Celtics!
     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Kevin Mahoney recently represented me in a case for destruction of property and disorderly conduct. He was extremely thorough and persistent, and despite a great deal of evidence against me, he managed to get the felony charge dropped without having to go to trial.

    I had never been in legal trouble before and had no idea how to proceed, and without his counsel, I am sure that I would have gotten convicted.

    He listened to my specific needs and always acted in my best interest. His knowledge, attention to detail, and general courtroom presence continued to amaze me throughout the entire process.
     

    text

  • M.K.about 1 month ago

    Dear Attorney Mahoney:

    I wish to express my sincere appreciation for your efforts on my behalf. Your defense was truly outstanding. The court room skills that you demonstrated and legal knowledge were truly incomparable. I’m wishing you the very best in your future endeavors.

    In addition, I ‘m looking forward to viewing the Jello Trial on Court T.V. Let me thank you once again.

     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    Is very knowledgeable and very professional. He has just represented me in a case lasting a year and a half, and he made sure I got a fair trial with a fair jury. He kept me well informed about what would be happening in the court room and always had a well thought out defense for any route of attack the D.A. would be planning on.

    My trial took 2 and a half days and after the jury deliberated for approximately 23 minutes they came back with a “Not guilty” verdict. I would recommend Attorney Mahoney to anyone I know, but I sure hope I dont need him again. : ) .
     

    text

Call 617.492.0055

Available to Respond to Emergencies
24 Hours a Day

Directions

Kevin J. Mahoney’s New Book Coming Soon

The Title IX Sexual Harassment Handbook

"Attorney Mahoney is currently authoring an authoritative and strategy driven compendium on investigating and defending Title IX sexual assault cases for lawyers, students, and universities. The book will be available through James Publishing within months."

Practice Areas

  • Shoplifting
  • Larceny by Check
  • Armed Robbery
  • Breaking and Entering
  • Embezzlement
© 2023 Mahoney Criminal Defense Group.
All Rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
footer-logo

For a Free in-office Consultation Call 617-492-0055

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Practice Areas
  • Areas we serve
  • Mahoney In the Media