Mahoney

  • Our Team
    • Column Team
      • Team
      • Kevin J. Mahoney
      • Joan M. LeGraw
      • Georgia Pasqualone
      • Roisin
  • Practice Areas
    • Column One
      • Drug Offenses
      • Crimes of Violence
      • Sex Crimes
      • Motor Vehicle Offenses
      • Theft Crimes
      • Illegal Possession of Firearms
      • Obstructing Justice Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
      • Federal Defense
      • Probation Violations
      • Restraining Orders
      • Professional Misconduct
      • Custody of Domestic Pets, Dogs & Cats Litigation
    • Column Two
      • Cyber Crimes
      • Hate Crimes
      • Appeals
      • Clerk Magistrate Hearings
      • Immigration
      • Civil Litigation
      • Civil Suits Against Law Enforcement
      • Personal Injury
      • College Crimes
      • Title IX Investigations
      • Juvenile Law
      • Estate Planning & Asset Protection
      • Last Will and Testament
      • Representation Before DCF
  • What Should I Do?
    • Cloumn One
      • Selecting a Winning Lawyer
      • Recommended Lawyers
      • Succeeding With Your Lawyer
      • Right to a Telephone Call
      • Miranda Rights
      • Should I Speak with Police?
      • Coping With Stress of Court
      • Bill of Rights
      • Mass Declaration of Rights
      • Street Encounters or Terry Stops
      • Cooperating With DEA or Police
    • Column Two
      • Common Defenses
      • Right to Self-Defense
      • Reasonable Doubt
      • What to Wear to Court
      • How to Behave in Court
      • Overview of the Justice System
      • Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer
      • Cambridge Drug Trafficking Lawyer: Knock and Talk
      • Motor Vehicle Searches
  • Forensics
    • Column One
      • Forensic Experts
      • Preserving the Crime Scene
      • Collecting Evidence
      • Trace Evidence
      • Fingerprint Evidence
      • Autopsy
      • Gunshot Wounds
      • Stab Wounds
      • Drowning
      • Child Homicide
      • Rape Kit
    • Column Two
      • DNA Evidence
      • Forensic Dentistry
      • Forensic Botany
      • Toxicology
  • Mahoney in the Media
    • In the News
    • TV Appearances
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

The Motion to Suppress

appeals2

Summary

To win a motion to suppress, a Woburn, Massachusetts drug trafficking lawyer must be able to identify the legal issues, research the relevant case law, and draft an airtight memorandum of law in support of the motion to suppress. Legal “issues” may be best described as the specific constitutional transgressions of law enforcement in searching or seizing an individual, a motor vehicle, a residence or a business. Unless a Boston drug trafficking attorney can identify legal issues, cite applicable case law, and articulate the constitutional shortcomings of law enforcement’s search, he has no realistic chance of winning a motion to suppress.

Effective Cross-Examination at the Hearing

Motions to suppress are resolved by an evidentiary hearing before the Court. At these hearings, the Assistant District Attorney or Assistant United States Attorney calls law enforcement officers (i.e., narcotics detectives, D.E.A. agents) to testify to the “facts” that provided them with the requisite “probable cause” justifying the search or the arrest. “Probable cause” requires law enforcement to identify the articulable facts from which they reasonably inferred the presence of drugs on the person, motor vehicle, or residence they searched. It is not uncommon for testifying law enforcement officers to “bend” or fabricate “facts.” Defense attorneys can discredit these detectives and agents with aggressive, methodical and savvy cross-examination based on a painstaking review of the police reports, lengthy meetings with the client, an inspection of the “scene of the crime,” a grasp of the unsavory investigatory techniques police employ to circumvent the constitution and, if obtainable, transcripts of the officers’ testimony in other cases. Attorney Kevin J. Mahoney has devoted an entire chapter of his best-selling book, Relentless Criminal Cross-Examination, to teaching criminal defense lawyers how to successfully cross-examine narcotics detectives, D.E.A. agents, confidential informants, and snitches.

Winning the Motion to Suppress

Attorney Mahoney crafts effective cross-examination strategy to complement the relevant case law to compel the judge to appreciate the unconstitutionality the search and to suppress the evidence. Because many judges are reluctant to suppress evidence, they will seek to identify any exception, legal loophole, or interpretation of the “facts” that will allow them to uphold the search. To restrain these judges from evading their duty to enforce the constitution, Mahoney strives to cut off every avenue of escape – tying the judge up like a rodeo steer. For experienced Massachusetts lawyers defending those accused of drug crimes, there is no more important societal obligation than persuading judges to force law enforcement to comply with the Constitution.

Using the Hearing to Prepare for Trial

Although winning the motion to suppress is almost always the top priority, cross-examination of the officers and the detectives at the hearing offers a Boston criminal attorney and Boston drug trafficking attorney the opportunity to “marry” these officers to a set of “facts,” and to develop both external and internal inconsistencies that he can use to discredit them at trial. A criminal defense attorney must always be looking ahead.

Winning the Trial

Should the court deny the motion to suppress, obviously the defense lawyer and his client must meet to discuss trial strategies and available defenses. Those defenses may include:

  • The government failed to prove that the “drug” was a controlled substance;
  • The government possesses inadequate proof that the illicit drugs belonged to the client;
  • The drugs belonged to the client, but the government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the amount of the confiscated drugs is inconsistent with personal use;
  • The government failed to prove that the client was arrested or the drugs were seized within 1000 feet of a school zone.

Attorney Mahoney is a Woburn drug trafficking lawyer who has won every drug possession and drug distribution case he has brought to trial with a well-researched, compellingly written Motion for a Required Finding of Not Guilty. In short, each one of these cases he persuaded the trial judge to dismiss the charges outright, rather than submit the case to the jury for deliberation.

Testimonials

  • NS, a DUI client,about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    I just wanted to say thank you for such a wonderful and excellent job you did for me. You were quite impressive up there and you really did your homework catching her in a few lies from previous testimony. You are the best! Even though I never want to be in this situation again, if I know anyone I will give them your name.

    Thank Amy for me too! She is a great asset to have in your office! Very pleasant and understanding.

    Again thank you and go Celtics!
     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Kevin Mahoney recently represented me in a case for destruction of property and disorderly conduct. He was extremely thorough and persistent, and despite a great deal of evidence against me, he managed to get the felony charge dropped without having to go to trial.

    I had never been in legal trouble before and had no idea how to proceed, and without his counsel, I am sure that I would have gotten convicted.

    He listened to my specific needs and always acted in my best interest. His knowledge, attention to detail, and general courtroom presence continued to amaze me throughout the entire process.
     

    text

  • M.K.about 1 month ago

    Dear Attorney Mahoney:

    I wish to express my sincere appreciation for your efforts on my behalf. Your defense was truly outstanding. The court room skills that you demonstrated and legal knowledge were truly incomparable. I’m wishing you the very best in your future endeavors.

    In addition, I ‘m looking forward to viewing the Jello Trial on Court T.V. Let me thank you once again.

     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    Is very knowledgeable and very professional. He has just represented me in a case lasting a year and a half, and he made sure I got a fair trial with a fair jury. He kept me well informed about what would be happening in the court room and always had a well thought out defense for any route of attack the D.A. would be planning on.

    My trial took 2 and a half days and after the jury deliberated for approximately 23 minutes they came back with a “Not guilty” verdict. I would recommend Attorney Mahoney to anyone I know, but I sure hope I dont need him again. : ) .
     

    text

Call 617.492.0055

Available to Respond to Emergencies
24 Hours a Day

Directions

Kevin J. Mahoney’s New Book Coming Soon

The Title IX Sexual Harassment Handbook

"Attorney Mahoney is currently authoring an authoritative and strategy driven compendium on investigating and defending Title IX sexual assault cases for lawyers, students, and universities. The book will be available through James Publishing within months."

Practice Areas

  • Drug Offenses
  • Drug Crimes and Penalties
  • Simple Drug Possession
  • Motion to Suppress
  • Civil Forfeiture
  • Drug Trafficking
© 2019 Mahoney Criminal Defense Group.
All Rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
footer-logo

For a Free in-office Consultation Call 617-492-0055

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Practice Areas
  • Areas we serve
  • Mahoney In the Media