Mahoney

  • Our Team
    • Column Team
      • Team
      • Kevin J. Mahoney
      • Joan M. LeGraw
      • Georgia Pasqualone
      • Roisin
  • Practice Areas
    • Column One
      • Drug Offenses
      • Crimes of Violence
      • Sex Crimes
      • Motor Vehicle Offenses
      • Theft Crimes
      • Illegal Possession of Firearms
      • Obstructing Justice Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
      • Federal Defense
      • Probation Violations
      • Restraining Orders
      • Professional Misconduct
      • Custody of Domestic Pets, Dogs & Cats Litigation
    • Column Two
      • Cyber Crimes
      • Hate Crimes
      • Appeals
      • Clerk Magistrate Hearings
      • Immigration
      • Civil Litigation
      • Civil Suits Against Law Enforcement
      • Personal Injury
      • College Crimes
      • Title IX Investigations
      • Juvenile Law
      • Estate Planning & Asset Protection
      • Last Will and Testament
      • Representation Before DCF
  • What Should I Do?
    • Cloumn One
      • Selecting a Winning Lawyer
      • Recommended Lawyers
      • Succeeding With Your Lawyer
      • Right to a Telephone Call
      • Miranda Rights
      • Should I Speak with Police?
      • Coping With Stress of Court
      • Bill of Rights
      • Mass Declaration of Rights
      • Street Encounters or Terry Stops
      • Cooperating With DEA or Police
    • Column Two
      • Common Defenses
      • Right to Self-Defense
      • Reasonable Doubt
      • What to Wear to Court
      • How to Behave in Court
      • Overview of the Justice System
      • Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer
      • Cambridge Drug Trafficking Lawyer: Knock and Talk
      • Motor Vehicle Searches
  • Forensics
    • Column One
      • Forensic Experts
      • Preserving the Crime Scene
      • Collecting Evidence
      • Trace Evidence
      • Fingerprint Evidence
      • Autopsy
      • Gunshot Wounds
      • Stab Wounds
      • Drowning
      • Child Homicide
      • Rape Kit
    • Column Two
      • DNA Evidence
      • Forensic Dentistry
      • Forensic Botany
      • Toxicology
  • Mahoney in the Media
    • In the News
    • TV Appearances
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

Terrorism

overview-justice-system-1

Defense of Domestic Terrorism

PRINT THIS PAGE

 

Being accused of being a “terrorist” or of committing an act of terrorism is so frightening in its implications that an individual and his family may feel that there is simply no way to fight back. With the full weight of the Federal Government coming down on him, an individual accused of terrorism may rightfully wonder if he has any rights at all. He does. But, his attorney must be prepared to battle the government to safeguard those rights. In perhaps no other type of case will a Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer have to work as hard to ensure his client fundamental Due Process and a fair trial.

Cambridge Criminal Lawyer: Defining Terrorism

While the term “domestic terrorism” is widely used and its meaning fairly well understood, it is defined under the Patriot Act (18 U.S.C. § 2331) as activities that:

(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(B) appear to be intended –

(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or

(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction ofthe United States.

Though this definition appears fairly specific, it can be interpreted quite broadly. Indeed, Federal prosecutors can charge individuals accused of routine criminal acts with domestic terrorism. After all, most criminal acts are “dangerous to human life” and are intended to “intimidate or coerce a civilian population.” Indeed, an aggressive prosecutor could interpret “unpatriotic” activities, such as assembling to exercise the right to protest and to dissent, as sufficiently “intimidating” and “dangerous” to come within the parameters of the Patriot Act. Since Federal prosecutors have historically misused the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO Act), a law designed to help law enforcement combat organized crime, to prosecute individuals, businesses and religions with no connection to organized crime, it is only a matter of time before they target non-terrorists for prosecution under the Patriot Act.

Writ of Habeas Corpus

The right of Habeas Corpus, nearly forgotten because of the long accepted tradition in our courts that an individual accused of a crime has the right to appear in court and contest the charges, has been abridged by the Patriot Act. The Writ of Habeas Corpus is a summons requiring the authorities detaining an individual to bring the prisoner before the proper court so that the court can determine whether these authorities have the lawful authority to hold the individual. If this custodian cannot provide sufficient proof that it has a legally recognized authority to detain the individual, the court orders the custodian to release him. Without the Writ of Habeas Corpus, a State or Federal authority could simply take an individual into custody and neither the individual, his family, his attorney, nor the courts would have power to force the authority to bring the individual to court, explain the reasons for his detention, or require his release. Albert Venn Dicey, a British jurist, wrote that the right to Habeas Corpus is “for practical purposes worth a hundred constitutional articles guaranteeing individual liberty.” If not for the right to Habeas Corpus, an individual accused of a crime would have no way to exercise any other rights.

In an affront to the Habeas Corpus doctrine and long-established legal precedent, the Bush Administration argued that it had the power, under the Patriot Act, to indefinitely detain an individual, including U.S. citizens, suspected of terrorist activity without charging him with a crime. The Administration argued that these “enemy combatants,” a term that had previously been used to describe prisoners of war, have no recognizable rights under the Constitution, including access to lawyers. Aside from the rights afforded prisoners of war by the Geneva Convention, prisoners of war have had no legal right to access U.S. civilian courts. By labeling U.S. citizens suspected of terrorist activities as “enemy combatants,” the Bush Administration claimed the power to suspend the right of habeas corpus. It remains to be seen how the Obama Administration interprets its powers under the Patriot Act.

Of the Patriot Act, Congressman David Obey of Wisconsin deadpanned upon its passage, “Why should we care, it’s only the Constitution?”

Kevin J. Mahoney is a Cambridge, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer.

TOP

Testimonials

  • NS, a DUI client,about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    I just wanted to say thank you for such a wonderful and excellent job you did for me. You were quite impressive up there and you really did your homework catching her in a few lies from previous testimony. You are the best! Even though I never want to be in this situation again, if I know anyone I will give them your name.

    Thank Amy for me too! She is a great asset to have in your office! Very pleasant and understanding.

    Again thank you and go Celtics!
     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Kevin Mahoney recently represented me in a case for destruction of property and disorderly conduct. He was extremely thorough and persistent, and despite a great deal of evidence against me, he managed to get the felony charge dropped without having to go to trial.

    I had never been in legal trouble before and had no idea how to proceed, and without his counsel, I am sure that I would have gotten convicted.

    He listened to my specific needs and always acted in my best interest. His knowledge, attention to detail, and general courtroom presence continued to amaze me throughout the entire process.
     

    text

  • M.K.about 1 month ago

    Dear Attorney Mahoney:

    I wish to express my sincere appreciation for your efforts on my behalf. Your defense was truly outstanding. The court room skills that you demonstrated and legal knowledge were truly incomparable. I’m wishing you the very best in your future endeavors.

    In addition, I ‘m looking forward to viewing the Jello Trial on Court T.V. Let me thank you once again.

     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    Is very knowledgeable and very professional. He has just represented me in a case lasting a year and a half, and he made sure I got a fair trial with a fair jury. He kept me well informed about what would be happening in the court room and always had a well thought out defense for any route of attack the D.A. would be planning on.

    My trial took 2 and a half days and after the jury deliberated for approximately 23 minutes they came back with a “Not guilty” verdict. I would recommend Attorney Mahoney to anyone I know, but I sure hope I dont need him again. : ) .
     

    text

Call 617.492.0055

Available to Respond to Emergencies
24 Hours a Day

Directions

Kevin J. Mahoney’s New Book Coming Soon

The Title IX Sexual Harassment Handbook

"Attorney Mahoney is currently authoring an authoritative and strategy driven compendium on investigating and defending Title IX sexual assault cases for lawyers, students, and universities. The book will be available through James Publishing within months."

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
© 2022 Mahoney Criminal Defense Group.
All Rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
footer-logo

For a Free in-office Consultation Call 617-492-0055

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Practice Areas
  • Areas we serve
  • Mahoney In the Media