Mahoney

  • Our Team
    • Column Team
      • Team
      • Kevin J. Mahoney
      • Georgia Pasqualone
      • Roisin
  • Practice Areas
    • Column One
      • Drug Offenses
      • Crimes of Violence
      • Sex Crimes
      • Motor Vehicle Offenses
      • Theft Crimes
      • Illegal Possession of Firearms
      • Obstructing Justice Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
      • Federal Defense
      • Probation Violations
      • Restraining Orders
      • Professional Misconduct
      • Domestic Pets, Dogs & Cats Litigation
    • Column Two
      • Cyber Crimes
      • Hate Crimes
      • Appeals
      • Clerk Magistrate Hearings
      • Immigration
      • Civil Litigation
      • Civil Suits Against Law Enforcement
      • Personal Injury
      • College Crimes
      • Title IX Investigations
      • Juvenile Law
      • Estate Planning & Asset Protection
      • Last Will and Testament
      • Representation Before DCF
      • Dangerous or Nuisance Dog Defense
  • What Should I Do?
    • Cloumn One
      • Selecting a Winning Lawyer
      • Recommended Lawyers
      • Succeeding With Your Lawyer
      • Right to a Telephone Call
      • Miranda Rights
      • Should I Speak with Police?
      • Coping With Stress of Court
      • Bill of Rights
      • Mass Declaration of Rights
      • Street Encounters or Terry Stops
      • Cooperating With DEA or Police
    • Column Two
      • Common Defenses
      • Right to Self-Defense
      • Reasonable Doubt
      • What to Wear to Court
      • How to Behave in Court
      • Overview of the Justice System
      • Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer
      • Cambridge Drug Trafficking Lawyer: Knock and Talk
      • Motor Vehicle Searches
  • Forensics
    • Column One
      • Forensic Experts
      • Preserving the Crime Scene
      • Collecting Evidence
      • Trace Evidence
      • Fingerprint Evidence
      • Autopsy
      • Gunshot Wounds
      • Stab Wounds
      • Drowning
      • Child Homicide
      • Rape Kit
    • Column Two
      • DNA Evidence
      • Forensic Dentistry
      • Forensic Botany
      • Toxicology
  • Mahoney in the Media
    • In the News
    • TV Appearances
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

Obstruction of Justice

overview-justice-system-1

Obstruction of Justice Under Massachusetts Law

Obstruction of justice is a common law crime first recognized in 1859. Since it is a common law crime, the elements of the crime are not set by statute and may be modified to fit the crime. In order to prove the defendant guilty of obstruction of justice, the Commonwealth must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant:

  1. Law enforcement authorities were investigating an alleged crime;
  2. The defendant was aware of that investigation;
  3. The defendant requested, counseled, or otherwise endeavored to persuade a witness not to cooperate with those conducting the investigation or to lie to those conducting the investigation, lied to the police himself, destroyed, altered, or hid evidence of the crime; and,
  4. The defendant did so knowingly, willfully, and corruptly with the intent of interfering with the investigation.

Obstruction of Justice Under Federal Law

Obstruction of justice is also a federal crime, under 18 U.S.C. §§1501-1521. The federal laws cover a broad range of ways one can “obstruct justice.” Witness tampering, obstructing judicial, congressional, or administrative hearings, using threats or force to prevent the production of evidence, are all covered under this section of federal law.

Examples of Obstruction of Justice

Essentially, an individual obstructs justice when he interferes with those involved in a criminal investigation (police officers, prosecutors, witnesses, investigators, etc.). If the police bring an individual in for questioning, or question him on scene and the defendant lies, he may be guilty of obstructing justice.

If an individual destroys evidence connected to a crime, he may be guilty of obstructing justice. Aaron Hernandez allegedly destroyed surveillance video from the night Odin Lloyd was murdered. Though technically the security system installed in Hernandez’s home was his property, destroying it could be considered obstruction of justice.

An individual may not, however, be charged with obstructing justice for refusing to answer a law enforcement officer’s questions. Every individual has a Fifth Amendment Right to refuse to answer questions if those answers might incriminate him.

Contact a Massachusetts Criminal Defense Attorney

If you have been charged with obstruction of justice on the state or federal level, call the Mahoney Criminal Defense Group to schedule a free in-office consultation with Kevin J. Mahoney.

Testimonials

  • NS, a DUI client,about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    I just wanted to say thank you for such a wonderful and excellent job you did for me. You were quite impressive up there and you really did your homework catching her in a few lies from previous testimony. You are the best! Even though I never want to be in this situation again, if I know anyone I will give them your name.

    Thank Amy for me too! She is a great asset to have in your office! Very pleasant and understanding.

    Again thank you and go Celtics!
     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Kevin Mahoney recently represented me in a case for destruction of property and disorderly conduct. He was extremely thorough and persistent, and despite a great deal of evidence against me, he managed to get the felony charge dropped without having to go to trial.

    I had never been in legal trouble before and had no idea how to proceed, and without his counsel, I am sure that I would have gotten convicted.

    He listened to my specific needs and always acted in my best interest. His knowledge, attention to detail, and general courtroom presence continued to amaze me throughout the entire process.
     

    text

  • M.K.about 1 month ago

    Dear Attorney Mahoney:

    I wish to express my sincere appreciation for your efforts on my behalf. Your defense was truly outstanding. The court room skills that you demonstrated and legal knowledge were truly incomparable. I’m wishing you the very best in your future endeavors.

    In addition, I ‘m looking forward to viewing the Jello Trial on Court T.V. Let me thank you once again.

     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    Is very knowledgeable and very professional. He has just represented me in a case lasting a year and a half, and he made sure I got a fair trial with a fair jury. He kept me well informed about what would be happening in the court room and always had a well thought out defense for any route of attack the D.A. would be planning on.

    My trial took 2 and a half days and after the jury deliberated for approximately 23 minutes they came back with a “Not guilty” verdict. I would recommend Attorney Mahoney to anyone I know, but I sure hope I dont need him again. : ) .
     

    text

Call 617.492.0055

Available to Respond to Emergencies
24 Hours a Day

Directions

Kevin J. Mahoney’s New Book Coming Soon

The Title IX Sexual Harassment Handbook

"Attorney Mahoney is currently authoring an authoritative and strategy driven compendium on investigating and defending Title IX sexual assault cases for lawyers, students, and universities. The book will be available through James Publishing within months."

Practice Areas

  • Obstruction of Justice
  • Accessory
  • False Police Report
  • Perjury
  • Intimidation of a Witness
  • Resisting Arrest
  • Bail Jumping
© 2026 Mahoney Criminal Defense Group.
All Rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
footer-logo

For a Free in-office Consultation Call 617-492-0055

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Practice Areas
  • Areas we serve
  • Mahoney In the Media