Mahoney

  • Our Team
    • Column Team
      • Team
      • Kevin J. Mahoney
      • Joan M. LeGraw
      • Georgia Pasqualone
      • Roisin
  • Practice Areas
    • Column One
      • Drug Offenses
      • Crimes of Violence
      • Sex Crimes
      • Motor Vehicle Offenses
      • Theft Crimes
      • Illegal Possession of Firearms
      • Obstructing Justice Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
      • Federal Defense
      • Probation Violations
      • Restraining Orders
      • Professional Misconduct
      • Custody of Domestic Pets, Dogs & Cats Litigation
    • Column Two
      • Cyber Crimes
      • Hate Crimes
      • Appeals
      • Clerk Magistrate Hearings
      • Immigration
      • Civil Litigation
      • Civil Suits Against Law Enforcement
      • Personal Injury
      • College Crimes
      • Title IX Investigations
      • Juvenile Law
      • Estate Planning & Asset Protection
      • Last Will and Testament
      • Representation Before DCF
      • Dangerous or Nuisance Dog Defense
  • What Should I Do?
    • Cloumn One
      • Selecting a Winning Lawyer
      • Recommended Lawyers
      • Succeeding With Your Lawyer
      • Right to a Telephone Call
      • Miranda Rights
      • Should I Speak with Police?
      • Coping With Stress of Court
      • Bill of Rights
      • Mass Declaration of Rights
      • Street Encounters or Terry Stops
      • Cooperating With DEA or Police
    • Column Two
      • Common Defenses
      • Right to Self-Defense
      • Reasonable Doubt
      • What to Wear to Court
      • How to Behave in Court
      • Overview of the Justice System
      • Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer
      • Cambridge Drug Trafficking Lawyer: Knock and Talk
      • Motor Vehicle Searches
  • Forensics
    • Column One
      • Forensic Experts
      • Preserving the Crime Scene
      • Collecting Evidence
      • Trace Evidence
      • Fingerprint Evidence
      • Autopsy
      • Gunshot Wounds
      • Stab Wounds
      • Drowning
      • Child Homicide
      • Rape Kit
    • Column Two
      • DNA Evidence
      • Forensic Dentistry
      • Forensic Botany
      • Toxicology
  • Mahoney in the Media
    • In the News
    • TV Appearances
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

Pring Wilson

Pring-Wilson’s Challenges at Re-Trial

For the defense team, the elation they feel following Judge Regina Quinlan’s decision to award Alexander Pring-Wilson a new trial must be tempered by the challenges that remain. After all, the easy part is done. The Supreme Judicial Court’s recent decision in Commonwealth vs. Adjutant allowing a defendant to introduce an alleged victim’s history of violence to support a claim of self-defense forced Quinlan’s hand. It will prove a far more difficult task for the defense to convince the next jury to acquit Pring-Wilson. It was, after all, Pring-Wilson’s version of the stabbing that persuaded the first jury to convict him of manslaughter. Considered against the available forensic evidence showing that Pring-Wilson had plunged the knife into Michael Colono, Pring-Wilson’s claim that he only slashed at his attackers from a kneeling position is entirely untenable. And at the next trial, the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office will be entitled to introduce the transcripts of Pring-Wilson’s testimony from the first trial. Pring-Wilson’s unfortunate lie will dog him.

Having already testified under oath, Pring-Wilson will be tempted to stick with his story. He can argue that it was this version that persuaded the jury not to convict him of 1st or 2nd degree murder. No doubt, should he change his story now, the prosecution will delight in beating him over the head with his earlier version. Changing stories late in the game is not without risks. It makes no difference that the defense will be able to inform the jury of Colono’s propensity for violence, no jury is going to acquit a man who stabs another man to death and then lies about the stabbing. Carol Neville, the jury forewoman of his original jury, told Court TV that “the piece we kept coming back to is that Michael was stabbed five times with a pretty big knife in some pretty significant spots on his body. That didn’t line up with Alex’s saying he was on his knees fighting for his life.” Indeed, had Colono not been such an unsavory character, this jury might have convicted Pring-Wilson of murder.

Pring-Wilson’s lawyers must have a talk with their client. It is simply not possible for the defense to persuade a jury to acquit Pring-Wilson without first persuading Pring-Wilson to come clean about the stabbing. Pring-Wilson stabbed Colono and he did so deliberately. But, he had every right to defend himself, even using lethal force. Pring-Wilson was under no obligation, moral or legal, to refrain from using every available means to defend himself against to two drug dealers with an appetite for guns and violence. The victim of an unprovoked and vicious attack on a dark, lonely street in a less than desirable neighborhood, Pring-Wilson was fighting for his life. He would have been justified in stabbing them both.

Nothing short of the truth will persuade the next jury to acquit him.

“Fists Flying” – The Case Against Pring-Wilson

Prosecution Eyewitness Account:

As Alexander Pring-Wilson walked down Western Avenue wearing flip-flops and talking on his cell phone he thought he heard someone call to him. In a nonthreatening manner, he inquired, “Were you talking to me?” Wearing a black bandana, Michael Colono, a convicted crack dealer, snapped at him, “Yeah, you wanna do something about it?” The crack dealer exploded out of the car with fists flying at Pring-Wilson. The crack dealer’s cousin, Samuel Rodriguez, who’s lengthy record includes convictions for illegal possession of a gun, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, assault and battery and malicious destruction of property, joined the attack. He sucker punched Pring-Wilson in the head, throwing the punch “with everything he had,” trying to knock him out. Moments later, Pring-Wilson was on the pavement, brandishing a knife. When Rodriguez backed away, Pring-Wilson got to his feet, put the knife in his pocket and walked away.

That, unbelievably, was how Rodriguez, the Commonwealth’s star witness, described the confrontation. So menacing was Rodriguez as he testified in his full-length black overcoat, that a Court Officer positioned himself just to his side. Yet, the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office indicts Pring-Wilson, a Harvard University grad student, of 1st degree murder. Just what would the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office have had Pring-Wilson do, allow these two convicted felons to beat him to death?

In her opening, Assistant District Attorney Adrienne Lynch asserts that neither Colono nor Rodriguez was armed. It was, she claims, murder. From the safety of the Middlesex D.A.’s Office, with its bullet proof glass, Lynch and D.A. Martha Coakley decided that Pring-Wilson exceeded the reasonable bounds of self-defense. Perhaps, it was Coakley’s call. But, just how was Pring-Wilson to know that neither of his two attackers was armed? On this dark street, fighting for his life, Pring-Wilson was to divine their intent? He was to presume there was a line of decency that neither attacker would cross? According to the District Attorney’s Office, Pring-Wilson was only permitted to use lethal force after his attackers had crippled him, leaving their intentions unmistakable.

Martha Coakley’s Office put its trust in the word of Rodriguez. This is the same Rodriguez that fled the scene, who hid behind the Trader Joe’s on Memorial Drive, who testified, “I didn’t know how I was going to be able to talk my way out of this,” and who was so concerned with evading the Cambridge police, he wouldn’t take his dying cousin to the Cambridge Hospital.

Rather than prosecute Rodriguez for assault and battery, Coakley charges Pring-Wilson, a white, multilingual Harvard student from Colorado, with 1st degree murder. Extending Coakley the benefit of the doubt that her decision was not the product of political correctness, why did she indict Pring-Wilson for 1st degree murder? Under Massachusetts law, an excused killing that occurs during “sudden combat” is manslaughter. Coakley’s Office routinely indicts citizens accused of an unlawful killing for 1st degree murder when the accusations suggest no more than manslaughter. The decision to indict Pring-Wilson for 1st degree murder was certainly tactical – using the threat of life imprisonment to intimidate Pring-Wilson into accepting a manslaughter plea.

PRINT THIS PAGE

TOP

Testimonials

  • NS, a DUI client,about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    I just wanted to say thank you for such a wonderful and excellent job you did for me. You were quite impressive up there and you really did your homework catching her in a few lies from previous testimony. You are the best! Even though I never want to be in this situation again, if I know anyone I will give them your name.

    Thank Amy for me too! She is a great asset to have in your office! Very pleasant and understanding.

    Again thank you and go Celtics!
     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Kevin Mahoney recently represented me in a case for destruction of property and disorderly conduct. He was extremely thorough and persistent, and despite a great deal of evidence against me, he managed to get the felony charge dropped without having to go to trial.

    I had never been in legal trouble before and had no idea how to proceed, and without his counsel, I am sure that I would have gotten convicted.

    He listened to my specific needs and always acted in my best interest. His knowledge, attention to detail, and general courtroom presence continued to amaze me throughout the entire process.
     

    text

  • M.K.about 1 month ago

    Dear Attorney Mahoney:

    I wish to express my sincere appreciation for your efforts on my behalf. Your defense was truly outstanding. The court room skills that you demonstrated and legal knowledge were truly incomparable. I’m wishing you the very best in your future endeavors.

    In addition, I ‘m looking forward to viewing the Jello Trial on Court T.V. Let me thank you once again.

     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    Is very knowledgeable and very professional. He has just represented me in a case lasting a year and a half, and he made sure I got a fair trial with a fair jury. He kept me well informed about what would be happening in the court room and always had a well thought out defense for any route of attack the D.A. would be planning on.

    My trial took 2 and a half days and after the jury deliberated for approximately 23 minutes they came back with a “Not guilty” verdict. I would recommend Attorney Mahoney to anyone I know, but I sure hope I dont need him again. : ) .
     

    text

Call 617.492.0055

Available to Respond to Emergencies
24 Hours a Day

Directions

Kevin J. Mahoney’s New Book Coming Soon

The Title IX Sexual Harassment Handbook

"Attorney Mahoney is currently authoring an authoritative and strategy driven compendium on investigating and defending Title IX sexual assault cases for lawyers, students, and universities. The book will be available through James Publishing within months."

Our Team

  • Kevin J. Mahoney
    • Trial Record
    • Book: Relentless Criminal Cross-Examination
    • Philosophy
    • Commentary on the Power of the System
      • Judges
      • Unethical Prosecutors
      • Middlesex County D.A.’s Office
    • Commentary on High Profile Cases
      • Persecution of Palestinian Children By Israeli Military Courts
      • No Crying or Outcry Over Spilt Milk
      • Case Against Amanda Knox: All Fantasy No Evidence
      • U.S. Attorney’s Office on Tilt
      • Lindsay Lohan
      • Amanda Knox
      • Roger Clemens
      • Neil Entwistle
      • Andrea Yates
      • Martha Stewart
      • Scott Peterson
      • Kobe Bryant
      • Jayson Williams
      • Pring Wilson
    • Ode to Criminal Defense Lawyer
  • Team
    • Joan M. LeGraw
    • Georgia Pasqualone
    • Roisin
© 2023 Mahoney Criminal Defense Group.
All Rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
footer-logo

For a Free in-office Consultation Call 617-492-0055

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Practice Areas
  • Areas we serve
  • Mahoney In the Media