Mahoney

  • Our Team
    • Column Team
      • Team
      • Kevin J. Mahoney
      • Joan M. LeGraw
      • Georgia Pasqualone
      • Roisin
  • Practice Areas
    • Column One
      • Drug Offenses
      • Crimes of Violence
      • Sex Crimes
      • Motor Vehicle Offenses
      • Theft Crimes
      • Illegal Possession of Firearms
      • Obstructing Justice Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
      • Federal Defense
      • Probation Violations
      • Restraining Orders
      • Professional Misconduct
      • Custody of Domestic Pets, Dogs & Cats Litigation
    • Column Two
      • Cyber Crimes
      • Hate Crimes
      • Appeals
      • Clerk Magistrate Hearings
      • Immigration
      • Civil Litigation
      • Civil Suits Against Law Enforcement
      • Personal Injury
      • College Crimes
      • Title IX Investigations
      • Juvenile Law
      • Estate Planning & Asset Protection
      • Last Will and Testament
      • Representation Before DCF
      • Dangerous or Nuisance Dog Defense
  • What Should I Do?
    • Cloumn One
      • Selecting a Winning Lawyer
      • Recommended Lawyers
      • Succeeding With Your Lawyer
      • Right to a Telephone Call
      • Miranda Rights
      • Should I Speak with Police?
      • Coping With Stress of Court
      • Bill of Rights
      • Mass Declaration of Rights
      • Street Encounters or Terry Stops
      • Cooperating With DEA or Police
    • Column Two
      • Common Defenses
      • Right to Self-Defense
      • Reasonable Doubt
      • What to Wear to Court
      • How to Behave in Court
      • Overview of the Justice System
      • Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer
      • Cambridge Drug Trafficking Lawyer: Knock and Talk
      • Motor Vehicle Searches
  • Forensics
    • Column One
      • Forensic Experts
      • Preserving the Crime Scene
      • Collecting Evidence
      • Trace Evidence
      • Fingerprint Evidence
      • Autopsy
      • Gunshot Wounds
      • Stab Wounds
      • Drowning
      • Child Homicide
      • Rape Kit
    • Column Two
      • DNA Evidence
      • Forensic Dentistry
      • Forensic Botany
      • Toxicology
  • Mahoney in the Media
    • In the News
    • TV Appearances
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

Common Defenses to Allegations

overview-justice-system-1

Seven Common Defenses for the Accused

While the accused has no obligation to prove his innocence, and is indeed to be presumed innocent, Cambridge, Massachusetts criminal defense attorneys have historically relied on one or more of the following seven defenses to obtain acquittals for their clients accused of crimes:

No Crime Was Committed

 This defense is routinely employed in those crimes such as driving while intoxicated (i.e., no crime committed because he wasn’t intoxicated), sexual assault (i.e., no crime committed because the alleged victim consented), theft (i.e., no crime committed because no money missing or money or item belongs to accused), and murder (i.e., the deceased died of natural causes).  This defense is also available where the government has no proof of one or more of the elements of a crime.

I Was Unable to Commit the Crime

 This defense is typically used when the accused committed the offense, but lacked the ability, either because of mental illness, intoxication or overriding emotion, to either conform his behavior to the requirements of the law or form the intent to commit the crime, particularly where criminal statute requires the offender to possess a specific intent to commit the crime.

 

I Was Justified

 Where an individual is accused of assault and battery or even murder, he may concede he assaulted or killed a person, but he did so in self-defense or in defense of another. A variety of this defense may be used where an individual is charged with trespassing or breaking and entering and he maintains that circumstances, such as weather conditions, forced him to take shelter, etc.

The Eyewitnesses Saw Someone, But It Wasn’t Me

This defense is typically used where eyewitnesses place the accused at the scene of the crime or identify him as the perpetrator. Where the eyewitnesses have given inconsistent descriptions or failed to select the accused from a line-up, photo-array, or mug shot book, this is a very promising defense. Where available, this defense should, of course, be coupled with a credible alibi.

The Government Made Me Do It

 The entrapment defense is appropriate where a government agent, such as DEA agent or narcotics detective, induces an individual to commit a crime he otherwise would not have committed. Obviously, this defense will succeed more often if the accused has no history of committing the offense. It is not wise to employ this defense where a DEA agent, for example, did no more than encourage the accused to obtain and sell him more cocaine than he had previously sold to anyone.

Damn, I Hope You Can’t Prove This

 When no other defense is available, or in combination with the defenses outlined above, lawyers argue that the accused is presumed innocent and the evidence falls short of the “beyond the reasonable doubt standard.”

You Can’t Punish Me for This

 Where the proof is overwhelming, defense attorneys argue “jury nullification,” arguing that the government had no business criminalizing the conduct forming the basis of the charges or prosecuting this particular individual for violating the statute. Attorneys essentially ask jurors to nullify the law by acquitting the accused. Criminal Defense Lawyers may also appeal to jurors’ sense of fairness by noting that the government has unfairly singled out this individual when many people have engaged in similar conduct openly have not been prosecuted. It is usually only wise to rely on “jury nullification” when there is no victim. While juries always retain the power to acquit when presented with incontrovertible evidence, most courts in the United States discourage or even prohibit defense attorneys from directly appealing to juries to exercise their “jury nullification” power.

Kevin J. Mahoney is a Cambridge Criminal Defense Lawyer and author of Relentless Criminal Cross-Examination.

PRINT THIS PAGE

TOP

Testimonials

  • NS, a DUI client,about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    I just wanted to say thank you for such a wonderful and excellent job you did for me. You were quite impressive up there and you really did your homework catching her in a few lies from previous testimony. You are the best! Even though I never want to be in this situation again, if I know anyone I will give them your name.

    Thank Amy for me too! She is a great asset to have in your office! Very pleasant and understanding.

    Again thank you and go Celtics!
     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Kevin Mahoney recently represented me in a case for destruction of property and disorderly conduct. He was extremely thorough and persistent, and despite a great deal of evidence against me, he managed to get the felony charge dropped without having to go to trial.

    I had never been in legal trouble before and had no idea how to proceed, and without his counsel, I am sure that I would have gotten convicted.

    He listened to my specific needs and always acted in my best interest. His knowledge, attention to detail, and general courtroom presence continued to amaze me throughout the entire process.
     

    text

  • M.K.about 1 month ago

    Dear Attorney Mahoney:

    I wish to express my sincere appreciation for your efforts on my behalf. Your defense was truly outstanding. The court room skills that you demonstrated and legal knowledge were truly incomparable. I’m wishing you the very best in your future endeavors.

    In addition, I ‘m looking forward to viewing the Jello Trial on Court T.V. Let me thank you once again.

     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    Is very knowledgeable and very professional. He has just represented me in a case lasting a year and a half, and he made sure I got a fair trial with a fair jury. He kept me well informed about what would be happening in the court room and always had a well thought out defense for any route of attack the D.A. would be planning on.

    My trial took 2 and a half days and after the jury deliberated for approximately 23 minutes they came back with a “Not guilty” verdict. I would recommend Attorney Mahoney to anyone I know, but I sure hope I dont need him again. : ) .
     

    text

Call 617.492.0055

Available to Respond to Emergencies
24 Hours a Day

Directions

Kevin J. Mahoney’s New Book Coming Soon

The Title IX Sexual Harassment Handbook

"Attorney Mahoney is currently authoring an authoritative and strategy driven compendium on investigating and defending Title IX sexual assault cases for lawyers, students, and universities. The book will be available through James Publishing within months."

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
© 2023 Mahoney Criminal Defense Group.
All Rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
footer-logo

For a Free in-office Consultation Call 617-492-0055

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Practice Areas
  • Areas we serve
  • Mahoney In the Media