Mahoney

  • Our Team
    • Column Team
      • Team
      • Kevin J. Mahoney
      • Joan M. LeGraw
      • Georgia Pasqualone
      • Roisin
  • Practice Areas
    • Column One
      • Drug Offenses
      • Crimes of Violence
      • Sex Crimes
      • Motor Vehicle Offenses
      • Theft Crimes
      • Illegal Possession of Firearms
      • Obstructing Justice Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
      • Federal Defense
      • Probation Violations
      • Restraining Orders
      • Professional Misconduct
      • Custody of Domestic Pets, Dogs & Cats Litigation
    • Column Two
      • Cyber Crimes
      • Hate Crimes
      • Appeals
      • Clerk Magistrate Hearings
      • Immigration
      • Civil Litigation
      • Civil Suits Against Law Enforcement
      • Personal Injury
      • College Crimes
      • Title IX Investigations
      • Juvenile Law
      • Estate Planning & Asset Protection
      • Last Will and Testament
      • Representation Before DCF
  • What Should I Do?
    • Cloumn One
      • Selecting a Winning Lawyer
      • Recommended Lawyers
      • Succeeding With Your Lawyer
      • Right to a Telephone Call
      • Miranda Rights
      • Should I Speak with Police?
      • Coping With Stress of Court
      • Bill of Rights
      • Mass Declaration of Rights
      • Street Encounters or Terry Stops
      • Cooperating With DEA or Police
    • Column Two
      • Common Defenses
      • Right to Self-Defense
      • Reasonable Doubt
      • What to Wear to Court
      • How to Behave in Court
      • Overview of the Justice System
      • Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer
      • Cambridge Drug Trafficking Lawyer: Knock and Talk
      • Motor Vehicle Searches
  • Forensics
    • Column One
      • Forensic Experts
      • Preserving the Crime Scene
      • Collecting Evidence
      • Trace Evidence
      • Fingerprint Evidence
      • Autopsy
      • Gunshot Wounds
      • Stab Wounds
      • Drowning
      • Child Homicide
      • Rape Kit
    • Column Two
      • DNA Evidence
      • Forensic Dentistry
      • Forensic Botany
      • Toxicology
  • Mahoney in the Media
    • In the News
    • TV Appearances
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

Jury Selection Procedure

crimes-of-violence-1

Jury Selection is a Misnomer

PRINT THIS PAGE

 

Cambridge Criminal Lawyer Explains Jury Selection

How is the Jury Selected for a Trial in Massachusetts?

If you are charged with a criminal offense, you are naturally curious about how the lawyers will select the individuals who will determine your fate. What exactly is the jury selection process? How do defense lawyers determine who will sit on your trial? How can the judge, the prosecutor, and your ensure that these jurors will judge the evidence fairly? How do defense lawyers uncover the biases of these jurors?

Jury selection is a misnomer. We do not select a jury. We either challenge potential jurors for cause or use peremptory challenges to eliminate jurors we believe will favor the prosecution. The jurors who remain, after the defense lawyer and the prosecutor have exercised their challenges, are sworn in as the jury. As you can see, we do not actually select anyone.

Who Summons These Potential Jurors?

In Massachusetts, the Jury Commissioner for the Commonwealth selects at random Massachusetts residents who are eighteen years of age or older and speak English to report for jury duty. A resident need not have registered to vote in order to be summonsed to jury duty.

How Do the Court and Lawyers Unearth the Biases of Those Summoned for Jury Duty?

Each individual summonsed for jury duty is obligated to complete a juror questionnaire. The questionnaire is quite simple and can be completed in just a few minutes. Most of the questions are not overly intrusive and, therefore, the answers are not very helpful to the attorneys in determining whether the potential juror possesses a bias that would disqualify him for jury duty. Those summonsed for jury duty are required to provide basic background information on matters such as:

  • Highest level of education
  • Employment or school status
  • Marital and parental status, including the ages of any children
  • Spouse’s highest level of education
  • Spouse’s employment or school status
  • Involvement of any household or family member in any prior legal proceedings, including any criminal charges, civil proceedings, and prior jury service

Finally, the questionnaire asks whether the individual’s background, experience, employment, training, education, knowledge, or beliefs might affect his ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror.

The answers to these questions provide clues to the potential juror’s likely prejudices, level of intelligence, and fitness for jury duty. From a juror’s answers, demeanor, attitude, attire, and command of the English language, criminal defense lawyers and prosecutors attempt to divine his biases, aptitude, and abilities. Contrary to the commonly held belief that for criminal defense lawyers the more-dimwitted-the-better, defense lawyers prefer jurors with high levels of education, especially those who likely possess well-developed analytical skills. Just as criminal defense lawyers are apt to challenge or strike those who would likely side with the prosecutor (i.e., police officers, meter maids, security personnel, etc.), prosecutors are apt to challenge those who are likely to favor the defense (i.e., those who have been charged with criminal offenses, those who appear anti-establishment, etc.).  

How Does a Lawyer Challenge a Potential Juror for Cause?

During the jury selection process, the defense lawyer and the prosecutor usually stand at side bar (to the side of the judge’s bench). There, they quietly discuss the potential jurors’ answers to the questionnaire. If a potential juror’s answers raise concerns about his impartiality or fitness to serve as a juror, the judge instructs a court officer to escort him to the side bar. There, the judge (and, perhaps the lawyers), will question the juror about the troubling answers or information provided. If the juror fails to dispel the judge’s concerns about his fitness to serve on the jury, the judge will likely eliminate him from further consideration. If the juror allays the judge’s concerns, he will ask the defense lawyer and the prosecutor if they have any objections to the juror sitting on the jury. If either lawyer challenges the potential juror for cause and persuades the judge that the juror is unfit for jury duty the judge will dismiss the potential juror from the jury pool. 

How Does a Lawyer Use a Peremptory Challenge?

Peremptory challenges bestow on both the prosecutor and the criminal defense lawyer the right to strike a potential juror from the jury without providing a supporting rational. In Massachusetts District Courts, lawyers are awarded only two peremptory challenges. In contrast, Massachusetts Superior Courts allot peremptory challenges according to the specific criminal charge. Where the defendant is charged with a crime punishable by life in prison (such as murder), the court allots defense counsel and the prosecutor twelve peremptory challenges. In nearly all other cases, the Superior Court allocates four peremptory challenges per side. Once potential jurors are seated in the jury box, the prosecutor is afforded the opportunity to use his peremptory challenges. The stricken jurors, if any, are replaced with new potential jurors. The Court then allows the criminal defense lawyer to use his peremptory challenges. The stricken jurors are, again, replaced. If the prosecutor has any unused peremptory challenges, he can use them at this time – but only on jurors he has not previously had an opportunity to challenge. Any potential jurors are, once again, replaced. The process repeats itself until either both sides exhaust their peremptory challenges.

Are There Any Limitations on Lawyers Using Peremptory Challenges?

Yes. Lawyers are not permitted to use peremptory challenges to strike a juror because of his race or gender. If a lawyer attempts to strike a juror, such as a black person, from the jury he may be required to provide the judge with a race or gender-neutral reason for exercising his peremptory challenge.

The Final Jury

At the conclusion of the jury selection process, the trial judge will ask, in open court, both the criminal defense lawyer and the prosecutor if they are satisfied with the jury. Even if the defense lawyer is dissatisfied with one or more of the jurors, he will feel compelled to answer that the jury is satisfactory to the defense; After all, he cannot risk alienating any jurors by declaring that he believes that they will judge his client unfairly. The clerk swears in the jury.

Jury Deliberations

Once both the prosecutor and criminal defense lawyer rests, and the judge advises the jury on the applicable law, the jury retires to the deliberating room to discuss the case. The jurors are, essentially, sequestered during these deliberations. In the vast majority of cases, jurors are permitted to return home at the end of each day if they have been unable to reach a verdict.

How Do I Get Out of Jury Duty?

We need intelligent, educated, and decent folks to serve on our juries. If you are able to persuade a judge to dismiss you from the pool of potential jurors, you deprive us of your wisdom, life experience, and insights. It would be indeed very unfortunate if an innocent individual were to be convicted because those who might prove to be outstanding jurors had managed to evade jury duty.

Kevin J. Mahoney is a Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer.

TOP

Testimonials

  • NS, a DUI client,about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    I just wanted to say thank you for such a wonderful and excellent job you did for me. You were quite impressive up there and you really did your homework catching her in a few lies from previous testimony. You are the best! Even though I never want to be in this situation again, if I know anyone I will give them your name.

    Thank Amy for me too! She is a great asset to have in your office! Very pleasant and understanding.

    Again thank you and go Celtics!
     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Kevin Mahoney recently represented me in a case for destruction of property and disorderly conduct. He was extremely thorough and persistent, and despite a great deal of evidence against me, he managed to get the felony charge dropped without having to go to trial.

    I had never been in legal trouble before and had no idea how to proceed, and without his counsel, I am sure that I would have gotten convicted.

    He listened to my specific needs and always acted in my best interest. His knowledge, attention to detail, and general courtroom presence continued to amaze me throughout the entire process.
     

    text

  • M.K.about 1 month ago

    Dear Attorney Mahoney:

    I wish to express my sincere appreciation for your efforts on my behalf. Your defense was truly outstanding. The court room skills that you demonstrated and legal knowledge were truly incomparable. I’m wishing you the very best in your future endeavors.

    In addition, I ‘m looking forward to viewing the Jello Trial on Court T.V. Let me thank you once again.

     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    Is very knowledgeable and very professional. He has just represented me in a case lasting a year and a half, and he made sure I got a fair trial with a fair jury. He kept me well informed about what would be happening in the court room and always had a well thought out defense for any route of attack the D.A. would be planning on.

    My trial took 2 and a half days and after the jury deliberated for approximately 23 minutes they came back with a “Not guilty” verdict. I would recommend Attorney Mahoney to anyone I know, but I sure hope I dont need him again. : ) .
     

    text

Call 617.492.0055

Available to Respond to Emergencies
24 Hours a Day

Directions

Kevin J. Mahoney’s New Book Coming Soon

The Title IX Sexual Harassment Handbook

"Attorney Mahoney is currently authoring an authoritative and strategy driven compendium on investigating and defending Title IX sexual assault cases for lawyers, students, and universities. The book will be available through James Publishing within months."

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
© 2022 Mahoney Criminal Defense Group.
All Rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
footer-logo

For a Free in-office Consultation Call 617-492-0055

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Practice Areas
  • Areas we serve
  • Mahoney In the Media