Mahoney

  • Our Team
    • Column Team
      • Team
      • Kevin J. Mahoney
      • Joan M. LeGraw
      • Georgia Pasqualone
      • Roisin
  • Practice Areas
    • Column One
      • Drug Offenses
      • Crimes of Violence
      • Sex Crimes
      • Motor Vehicle Offenses
      • Theft Crimes
      • Illegal Possession of Firearms
      • Obstructing Justice Offenses
      • White Collar Crimes
      • Federal Defense
      • Probation Violations
      • Restraining Orders
      • Professional Misconduct
      • Custody of Domestic Pets, Dogs & Cats Litigation
    • Column Two
      • Cyber Crimes
      • Hate Crimes
      • Appeals
      • Clerk Magistrate Hearings
      • Immigration
      • Civil Litigation
      • Civil Suits Against Law Enforcement
      • Personal Injury
      • College Crimes
      • Title IX Investigations
      • Juvenile Law
      • Estate Planning & Asset Protection
      • Last Will and Testament
      • Representation Before DCF
      • Dangerous or Nuisance Dog Defense
  • What Should I Do?
    • Cloumn One
      • Selecting a Winning Lawyer
      • Recommended Lawyers
      • Succeeding With Your Lawyer
      • Right to a Telephone Call
      • Miranda Rights
      • Should I Speak with Police?
      • Coping With Stress of Court
      • Bill of Rights
      • Mass Declaration of Rights
      • Street Encounters or Terry Stops
      • Cooperating With DEA or Police
    • Column Two
      • Common Defenses
      • Right to Self-Defense
      • Reasonable Doubt
      • What to Wear to Court
      • How to Behave in Court
      • Overview of the Justice System
      • Massachusetts Criminal Defense Lawyer
      • Cambridge Drug Trafficking Lawyer: Knock and Talk
      • Motor Vehicle Searches
  • Forensics
    • Column One
      • Forensic Experts
      • Preserving the Crime Scene
      • Collecting Evidence
      • Trace Evidence
      • Fingerprint Evidence
      • Autopsy
      • Gunshot Wounds
      • Stab Wounds
      • Drowning
      • Child Homicide
      • Rape Kit
    • Column Two
      • DNA Evidence
      • Forensic Dentistry
      • Forensic Botany
      • Toxicology
  • Mahoney in the Media
    • In the News
    • TV Appearances
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

Martha Coakley as Middlesex County D.A.

middlesex-county-da20

Coakley’s Public Comments Don’t Measure Up to Reality

Office has Reputation for Unethical Tactics Toward Defense Attorneys
In response to the United States Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Blakely vs. Washington (2003), United States vs. Booker (2005) and United States vs. Fanfan (2005) freeing Federal District Court judges from having to sentence criminal defendants in accordance with the formally mandatory Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Middlesex County District Attorney Martha Coakley has made some surprising, if not entirely credible, public comments. As part of a CLS Sentencing Panel in January 2005, Coakley stated that in addressing the inadequacies of a criminal justice, not enough attention has been paid to the role of the defense attorney. She said treating defense lawyers as highly respected professionals is an important way to check the power of prosecutors.

Unfortunately, while the role of the criminal defense attorney is critical, there is no District Attorney’s Office in Massachusetts that treats defense counsel with less respect and more unconcealed contempt than Coakley’s office. Prior to Coakley, the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office had an “open file” policy. Under that policy, assistant district attorneys would literally open their files to defense lawyers and provide them with copies of any documents they desired. The open file policy fostered a respect between defense counsel and the prosecutor. It allowed defense counsel to assure himself that nothing was being kept from him and his client, thereby creating an atmosphere of trust and, perhaps, opening a dialogue that might lead to a fair resolution of the case short of a trial. Because defense counsel was permitted to access the D.A.’s file, he was well positioned to assure his own client that the prosecutor was not withholding evidence that at trial might tip the balance in favor of the defense.

But, Coakley discontinued this practice. For Coakley’s entire reign as District Attorney, defense attorneys have been forced to file discovery motion after discovery motion to force Coakley’s prosecutors to turn over to them evidence that the defense is entitled to under the rules of criminal procedure. It is not unusual for her minions to wait until just days before a serious trial to dump hundreds of pages of documents on a defense attorney or to spring “newly” discovered evidence on counsel during the trial. And, in an effort to deprive defense counsel of needed time to prepare for trial, Coakley’s prosecutors will serve dozens of motions, motions that they drafted days or weeks earlier, on him the day before or the first day of the trial. In short, Coakley’s prosecutors use every unsavory tactic at their disposal to make it impossible for defense counsel to properly prepare himself for trial.

And when those tactics fail, Coakley’s prosecutors employ even more brutish and unethical strategies to produce a victory for the prosecution. Her assistants enjoy a reputation for bullying defense witnesses and threatening those witnesses with phony prosecutions to scare them away from the witness stand. Prominent defense attorneys complain that Coakley assigns staff to follow them around the courthouse, eavesdropping on their conversations and secreting themselves in law libraries to learn what legal issues they are researching.

Worst of all, Coakley’s attorneys have been routinely caught failing to turn over exculpatory evidence to defense counsel. Only during a rape trial in August 2003, did a defense lawyer learn that the prosecutor possessed medical records of the so-called victim in which she stated that she and the accused had not had sexual intercourse. That prosecutor is still employed by Coakley. In a murder case, the defense claimed that the defendant was taken against his will to the Police Station. Defense counsel for all three co-defendants requested videotapes located within and outside the station that would have captured the defendants as they were brought into the station. Under court order, Coakley’s prosecutors turned over a tape – of the wrong date. When confronted in court, the prosecutors claimed it was a mistake. They later claimed that the videotape of that night was not available because the VCR was not working properly. Obviously, it is impossible to know in how many cases evidence is withheld. Coakley has created an atmosphere of distrust where once defense counsel and prosecutors enjoyed mutual respect.

Finally, as has already been explored on this site, Coakley’s office makes every effort to intimidate defense attorneys by threatening them with trumped up criminal charges and complaints of ethics violations to the Bar.

For Coakley to now claim that criminal justice system will function better if defense work is treated as a highly respected profession would be amusing if it did not show her to be such a threat to the rights of criminal defendants to prepared and unintimidated defense counsel. Shame on her.

The Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office

When the typical citizen considers the District Attorney’s Office here in Middlesex County (to the extent that he considers it at all), he perhaps recalls the sensational cases prosecuted by the office. Middlesex County has, unfortunately, become almost synonymous with high profile criminal prosecutions. In the past ten years, Court TV has covered the “Nanny” trial, the “Hockey Dad” trial, the Eddie O’Brien trial, and the “Mucko” McDermott trial.

Middlesex County District Attorney Martha Coakley is a long-time prosecutor. After the eight-year reign of Thomas Reilly, the grim, hard, charmless former District Attorney, the criminal defense bar had great hopes that Ms. Coakley would set a new tone for the office. In contrast to the image she projects on television, Ms. Coakley can be friendly and outgoing. Surprising many attorneys, Ms. Coakley runs an office outright hostile to defendants and their lawyers.

After two years in office, Ms. Coakley’s ideal for assistant district attorneys is, sadly, no secret. While the office hires mostly bright, newly minted lawyers to staff the district courts (where less serious offenses are prosecuted), the office is notorious for promoting only the most tightly-wound, holier-than-thou, black-and-white, and unreasonable assistant district attorneys to prosecute Superior Court cases. District Court prosecutors revealing any humanity whatsoever are eliminated from consideration.

In most counties, the criminal defense attorneys and the prosecutors mix freely. Although their respective obligations place them at opposing ends of the system, a certain camaraderie exists. Not in Middlesex County. In Cambridge Superior Court prosecutors huddle together in dark corners, interacting with defense attorneys as infrequently as possible.

That these Middlesex County prosecutors are coldly single minded in their pursuit of alleged law breakers can be unsettling. Many are oddly detached from their ethical obligations and for the Constitutional rights of the accused. The least ethical prosecutors know no depth to which they will not sink to obtain a conviction. Depriving the accused citizen of his right to a fair trial is–to too many Middlesex County prosecutors–a sport. Middlesex prosecutors are earning a reputation among defense attorneys for hiding exculpatory evidence, dishonesty and dirty tricks. Time and time again, Coakley’s office threatens to prosecute criminal defense attorneys with trumped up charges – all designed to intimidate and harass these lawyers into abandoning their obligations to their clients. A frightened defense attorney offers little resistance to a rabid prosecutor. And if these prosecutors secure a conviction against the accused, they seek unimaginably severe sentences. So wildly inappropriate was a recent recommendation of a Coakley prosecutor, a Superior Court judge characterized it as “irrational.”

Over-zealous law enforcement is no boon to a community. Local and State police take their cues from the District Attorney. Ms. Coakley runs an office so openly hostile to the Constitutional Rights of citizens accused of crimes it has become the enemy of not only the accused, but of the process. It is time to replace Ms. Coakley and elect a District Attorney conscientious of the rights of the victim and of the accused.

PRINT THIS PAGE

TOP

Testimonials

  • NS, a DUI client,about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    I just wanted to say thank you for such a wonderful and excellent job you did for me. You were quite impressive up there and you really did your homework catching her in a few lies from previous testimony. You are the best! Even though I never want to be in this situation again, if I know anyone I will give them your name.

    Thank Amy for me too! She is a great asset to have in your office! Very pleasant and understanding.

    Again thank you and go Celtics!
     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Kevin Mahoney recently represented me in a case for destruction of property and disorderly conduct. He was extremely thorough and persistent, and despite a great deal of evidence against me, he managed to get the felony charge dropped without having to go to trial.

    I had never been in legal trouble before and had no idea how to proceed, and without his counsel, I am sure that I would have gotten convicted.

    He listened to my specific needs and always acted in my best interest. His knowledge, attention to detail, and general courtroom presence continued to amaze me throughout the entire process.
     

    text

  • M.K.about 1 month ago

    Dear Attorney Mahoney:

    I wish to express my sincere appreciation for your efforts on my behalf. Your defense was truly outstanding. The court room skills that you demonstrated and legal knowledge were truly incomparable. I’m wishing you the very best in your future endeavors.

    In addition, I ‘m looking forward to viewing the Jello Trial on Court T.V. Let me thank you once again.

     

    text

  • about 1 month ago

    Attorney Mahoney,

    Is very knowledgeable and very professional. He has just represented me in a case lasting a year and a half, and he made sure I got a fair trial with a fair jury. He kept me well informed about what would be happening in the court room and always had a well thought out defense for any route of attack the D.A. would be planning on.

    My trial took 2 and a half days and after the jury deliberated for approximately 23 minutes they came back with a “Not guilty” verdict. I would recommend Attorney Mahoney to anyone I know, but I sure hope I dont need him again. : ) .
     

    text

Call 617.492.0055

Available to Respond to Emergencies
24 Hours a Day

Directions

Kevin J. Mahoney’s New Book Coming Soon

The Title IX Sexual Harassment Handbook

"Attorney Mahoney is currently authoring an authoritative and strategy driven compendium on investigating and defending Title IX sexual assault cases for lawyers, students, and universities. The book will be available through James Publishing within months."

Our Team

  • Kevin J. Mahoney
    • Trial Record
    • Book: Relentless Criminal Cross-Examination
    • Philosophy
    • Commentary on the Power of the System
      • Judges
      • Unethical Prosecutors
      • Middlesex County D.A.’s Office
    • Commentary on High Profile Cases
      • Persecution of Palestinian Children By Israeli Military Courts
      • No Crying or Outcry Over Spilt Milk
      • Case Against Amanda Knox: All Fantasy No Evidence
      • U.S. Attorney’s Office on Tilt
      • Lindsay Lohan
      • Amanda Knox
      • Roger Clemens
      • Neil Entwistle
      • Andrea Yates
      • Martha Stewart
      • Scott Peterson
      • Kobe Bryant
      • Jayson Williams
      • Pring Wilson
    • Ode to Criminal Defense Lawyer
  • Team
    • Joan M. LeGraw
    • Georgia Pasqualone
    • Roisin
© 2023 Mahoney Criminal Defense Group.
All Rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
footer-logo

For a Free in-office Consultation Call 617-492-0055

  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • What Should I Do?
  • Forensics
  • Mahoney in the Media
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Practice Areas
  • Areas we serve
  • Mahoney In the Media